Thursday, February 12, 2009

Nurturing an Established Melodrama

13 comments:

Σφιγξ said...

I really did not want to smatter my overprecious picture/word log with National Enquirer interest items but, this is such a prize...
for Chuck Palahniuk, Jeffrey Eugenides or ?

Then again, the coincidence of an Angelina look-alike octo-mom making her rounds of the incubabtors mounted with uV lamps makes me think of the litigation that would ensue, for their maintenance.

This touches me to the extent that I recall my undergraduate roommate, who turned her neglected, aquarium-tanked gerbils out to an awaiting cat. She is a mother of three, now.

The language of this entire "endeavor" fascinates me: "schlep them to the various therapies".

Σφιγξ said...

Yes, the experts look like a mini wax museum.

I like Kiki Smith so much for her explorations of the visceral and complex emotions around our body filth:

Untitled
1987­90
silvered glass water bottles
The Museum of Modern Art, New York, gift of Louis and Bessie Adler Foundation Inc., 1990

I used to love medieval books of hours, the idea that every hour you had some kind of meditation, something to think about or believe in. . . . I wanted to make a calendar with the fluids written on it, to think about every day. -Kiki Smith, 1998

Smith has developed an elaborate vocabulary to describe the body's forms and functions and its metaphorical role in society. Inspired by medieval prayer books, this installation consists of twelve glass water bottles that resemble antique medical specimen jars. Each bottle is empty, plated with silver, and etched in Gothic lettering with the name of a bodily fluid. The named substances range from life sustaining (semen, blood, milk) to disease bearing (pus and vomit), and they all evoke powerful emotional responses. Smith's "calendar" of carefully labeled vessels lends itself to an array of possible interpretations and points to humanity's complex relationship to the body and its products.

Σφιγξ said...

Beating this illusion of a suitable-love-match to a froth of frustration:

Chapter 4
...
"A man of liberal education, but with an income only just sufficient to enable him to associate in the rank of gentlemen, must feel absolutely certain that if he marries and has a family he shall be obliged, if he mixes at all in society, to rank himself with moderate farmers and the lower class of tradesmen. The woman that a man of education would naturally make the object of his choice would be one brought up in the same tastes and sentiments with himself and used to the familiar intercourse of a society totally different from that to which she must be reduced by marriage. Can a man consent to place the object of his affection in a situation so discordant, probably, to her tastes and inclinations? Two or three steps of descent in society, particularly at this round of the ladder, where education ends and ignorance begins, will not be considered by the generality of people as a fancied and chimerical, but a real and essential evil. If society be held desirable, it surely must be free, equal, and reciprocal society, where benefits are conferred as well as received, and not such as the dependent finds with his patron or the poor with the rich.

These considerations undoubtedly prevent a great number in this rank of life from following the bent of their inclinations in an early attachment. Others, guided either by a stronger passion, or a weaker judgement, break through these restraints, and it would be hard indeed, if the gratification of so delightful a passion as virtuous love, did not, sometimes, more than counterbalance all its attendant evils. But I fear it must be owned that the more general consequences of such marriages are rather calculated to justify than to repress the forebodings of the prudent."

...

http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/malthus/malthus.0.html

I recall, on several occasions, of being reminded (complete with the broken snicker into speech) of the pointlessness of my opinion on matters I have no real stake in.
What now, but of, reeling the big fish?

Σφιγξ said...

A likely answer would be, with hat in hand, "No, you are not being patronizing at all."

Σφιγξ said...

To add to that note about meat, I was reading in my translation of Götzen-Dämmerung (1888):

"The sedentary life (das sitzfleisch--literally "sitting meat") is the very sin against the Holy Spirit. Only thoughts reached by walking have value."

Philosophenweg of Heidelberg?

Σφιγξ said...

The comment about abortion was pat, and not thoughtful.


Bad behavior is having children one cannot afford, becoming a public charge?


https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/sociologists-say-malthus-shapes-welfare-policy-today

Σφιγξ said...

Why do you look here,and persist, if teaching clearly influences your decision not to go against your social class?

Σφιγξ said...

Substance abuse is a cause and a result of homelessness. The extreme heat here is scouring the encampments, and it is not infrequent to see a firetruck responding to a collapse since all the ambulances and paramedics are occupied, here.

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Psalms_Volume_1_Teach_the_Text_Commentar/EJMQBgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=tehillim%2032%20repentance%20bones&pg=PT420&printsec=frontcover

Tikkun HaKlali: 16, 32, 41, 42, 59, 77, 90, 105, 137, 150.

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Music_in_the_Hebrew_Bible/cXpkAgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Tikkun%20HaKlali&pg=PA149&printsec=frontcover

Σφιγξ said...

I am not outspoken about my political leanings, but I suspect that if I declined to jump into an event of joint enthusiasm, it would not be taken well.


https://books.google.com/books?id=h23HW5EJnyEC&pg=PA3&dq=Bernard+Baruch+Extraordinary+Popular+Delusions+and+the+Madness+of+Crowds+Mackay&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiTv4bdmK-HAxVSrYkEHUuuCG8Q6AF6BAgHEAM#v=onepage&q=Bernard%20Baruch%20Extraordinary%20Popular%20Delusions%20and%20the%20Madness%20of%20Crowds%20Mackay&f=false

Σφιγξ said...

When I go back to the content here, I feel justified in not hurrying to decide whatever remains to be decided.

Σφιγξ said...

https://theverse.co/pages/proverbs-31-woman-of-valor-bible-verse-resource-guide?srsltid=AfmBOootUtf_3gv5b4s3MmGf0D-l_-akMWqLco_cpKMdoMyO79uz0IVK

The acrostic Mishlei 31 is written in allegory for the Divine Presence, which is personified as female. It is read on Friday night.

No matter how fungible the sexes may appear by deceptive modern theories, there exists the need for a preservative, graceful character that is feminine to maintain peace and structure in the household. A woman can go out to earn a living; she can be an agent wherever she finds profit, but without having someone to do it on whose behalf, like a family, she will be unhappy. The victory is hollow.

In the present configuration, I make peace with what is, and manage my households generously and with a hopeful and helpful attitude.

https://theverse.co/pages/proverbs-31-woman-of-valor-bible-verse-resource-guide?srsltid=AfmBOootUtf_3gv5b4s3MmGf0D-l_-akMWqLco_cpKMdoMyO79uz0IVK

Σφιγξ said...

https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/rise-of-the-luxury-belief-class

https://virginialiving.com/culture/lightening-in-a-bottle/

Σφιγξ said...

https://dailyfreepress.com/2020/12/02/sincerely-ally-networking-and-nepotism-are-both-ok-as-long-as-we-recognize-the-impact-of-our-connections/

I do not accept that my current state is where I will remain, but since I was a young person I became attuned to the degree of my exclusion from society. Fundamentally, I have no stake in it; I tacitly participate. This extends into the gentile world - I do not have points of connection with the holidays, the sports, the social media affiliations, the investment in a pedigreed dog, the expensive spandex for lounging, not working out, the oversweetened beverages, the intense competition over nonproductive positions, et cetera, so I do not win favor for this.

I would feel like more of a fool to obtain a graduate degree in my industry, and still work my current position. I am still inching toward another degree, not for acceptance, but I can do it- hollow victory that it is.

"Yaakov’s willingness to accept Lavan’s terms was not because he did not know how to cut a good business deal. He knew how to negotiate and he knew that if he pressed his case, he could have gotten his way. The reason why he worked seven more years was in order to not devastate Leah. Had he stood up for his rights, he would have received 'two wives for the price of one' and one of the wives would have felt that 'he got her for nothing.'"

https://torah.org/torah-portion/ravfrand-5766-vayeitzei/